El HaDegel

El HaDegel’s website states that answers must be provided before a state commission of inquiry, but another article headed “A state commission of inquiry now” expressly says that the demand should focus on the investigators and their powers, not on who makes the appointments. Because the statement includes a particular appointment mechanism, the position was therefore changed to neutral.

El HaDegel’s official position states that the court would operate within clear boundaries and could not invalidate laws on the basis of general principles, but only where they directly contradict a Basic Law. This is precise and current wording that would narrow the scope of review over the Knesset.

In its current platform, El HaDegel pledges to limit a prime minister’s tenure to eight years—almost exactly two full terms. The wording specifies a number of years rather than two consecutive terms.

El HaDegel’s platform proposes moving from sectoral allocations to national, equitable budgeting. This direction is consistent with the statement, but no wording was found in the source that requires overriding every existing coalition agreement.

No quotation, platform provision, or parliamentary action was found in the sources reviewed that resolves whether the government may act contrary to the Attorney General’s opinion as long as a court has not invalidated the decision. General support for gatekeepers or for an independent judiciary is insufficient for this precise mechanism.

El HaDegel expressly publishes the goal of a demilitarized civilian government in Gaza, with Israeli security responsibility and regional backing. This directly combines a non-Hamas civilian government with a regional framework.

El HaDegel stipulates Israeli security responsibility alongside a demilitarized civilian government and regional backing. This points in the direction of the statement, but it does not explicitly address both border control and freedom of action inside the Strip.

El HaDegel portrays a horizon for a Palestinian state as a negative outcome that would reward Hamas. This points against the statement, but it is not a complete diplomatic plan resolving every condition for a regional settlement.

El HaDegel’s available platform speaks of exacting a territorial price for security needs and not relinquishing assets, but it does not commit to applying sovereignty throughout Area C. This is a nearby position, not the same position.

El HaDegel emphasizes service by every segment of the population and accommodations for religious belief, but does not specify opening every combat and command role to women. The general principle does not resolve the statement.

In an official El HaDegel article, Matan Yaffe wrote that the government’s focus on settlement in Gaza is a detached vision rather than a strategy. This directly opposes advancing the measure, although an opinion article is not a binding platform.

An official El HaDegel article states that the death penalty can be justified in certain cases, but rejects a culture that celebrates executions. This is a conditional position: it neither supports a blanket requirement nor rules out the penalty in every case.

El HaDegel’s platform requires every citizen to perform military, national, or civilian service, exactly as the statement proposes.

El HaDegel links non-service to the personal loss of economic and employment rights, with no sector-wide exemption.

El HaDegel’s platform addresses freedom of religion and a civil contract, but no clear commitment was found to full civil marriage alongside religious marriage.

No sufficiently direct public source was found that resolves El HaDegel’s position on permitting consensual civil arbitration in religious courts.

No explicit provision was found in El HaDegel’s platform on public transport on Shabbat at the discretion of local authorities.

El HaDegel’s platform requires a mandatory baseline in every publicly funded educational institution. This is an express condition linking funding to a minimum core curriculum.

El HaDegel’s platform speaks of equal rights and duties, but does not commit to a general Basic Law enshrining equality and prohibiting discrimination.

No explicit rule was found in El HaDegel’s platform or a leadership statement regarding an Arab party joining a coalition after accepting its basic guidelines.

No provision was found in El HaDegel’s program that resolves taxing high earners in order to expand social services.

El HaDegel supports removing barriers and increasing competition, but no position on food-price controls was found. There is no basis to determine whether it supports or opposes them.

No precise provision was found in El HaDegel’s program on reducing tariffs on agricultural food products versus protecting domestic production.

El HaDegel’s service program does not specify whether or how the father’s status would be used in daycare-subsidy eligibility criteria.

No El HaDegel source was found that resolves the VAT-exemption order up to $130.

As of 3 August 2026, no clear, current public position by El HaDegel was found on the specific mechanism in the statement. Opposition to violence or general support for enforcement is insufficient to attribute a position.

No provision was found in El HaDegel’s platform on easing the Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law and permitting Palestinian family reunification following individual assessment.

No source was found in El HaDegel’s platform or a leadership statement that resolves a statutory prohibition on conversion therapy for minors.

El HaDegel proposes a national program combining enforcement and weapons collection with education, training, infrastructure, service, housing, and strengthening Arab localities.

No provision was found in El HaDegel’s program that resolves the Greater Tel Aviv congestion charge.