Otzma Yehudit

Five Otzma Yehudit members present for the roll-call vote voted against the bill to establish a state commission of inquiry. This is a direct and unambiguous parliamentary-group pattern, not an inference from the party's membership in the coalition.

Otzma Yehudit rejected a compromise on curtailing the reasonableness standard and demanded that the legislation be passed as written. This is a direct party source on curtailing High Court of Justice review of the government, not an inference from coalition membership.

In the roll-call vote on limiting a prime minister to two consecutive terms, all six Otzma Yehudit members listed in the record voted against. The complete record supports coding the party as opposed with high confidence.

Earmarked coalition allocations were approved in accordance with Otzma Yehudit's demands, the opposite of abolishing the funds and transferring them to an equitable allocation process. The principal source is the 2023 budget, and no more current policy commitment was found.

All six Otzma Yehudit members voted for the law. This was a complete and unanimous vote on the exact mechanism.

Ben Gvir promotes a continued Israeli presence, settlement, and encouragement of emigration as the alternative for the day after the war. This is incompatible with a regional framework for civilian administration. However, no statement was found in which he explicitly rejects such a framework.

Ben Gvir opposes withdrawing from the Netzarim Corridor and promotes Israeli settlement and control in the Gaza Strip. Such a position necessarily entails at least long-term security control and freedom of action, so it supports the thesis.

Otzma Yehudit supported the resolution opposing a Palestinian state even as part of a diplomatic settlement and promotes sovereignty and settlement instead. The action and the party's current line reject the thesis.

Sovereignty in Judea and Samaria is an official, longstanding Otzma Yehudit policy, and in 2025 the parliamentary group said it would vote for a sovereignty law.

In May 2026, Otzma Yehudit MK Limor Son Har-Melech explicitly opposed integrating female soldiers into combat units, arguing that it harms the ability to win. This is direct, current opposition to the expansion in the thesis.

Ben Gvir presented renewed Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip and encouragement of emigration as elements of ‘total victory.’ The party continues to promote the objective publicly.

Otzma Yehudit led the legislation, and members of the parliamentary group supported it in the final vote.

Ben Gvir supported expanding military service among Haredim but rejected coercion. The thesis concerns a legal obligation, not merely encouragement, so the quotation leans toward opposition.

Ben Gvir rejected coercion in the conscription of Haredim, and the party supported freezing the arrest of people subject to conscription. Both positions conflict with the sanctions in the thesis.

Otzma Yehudit explicitly opposed civil marriage in its response during the 2019 election. No further explicit statement has been found since then.

All five Otzma Yehudit members voted for the law on third reading.

Otzma Yehudit explicitly opposed public transport on Shabbat in its response. No updated formulation has been found since then.

No direct, current party source was found in which Otzma Yehudit determines whether funding for educational institutions should be conditional on teaching a minimum core curriculum.

No direct party source was found that takes a position on generally enshrining the right to equality and the prohibition of discrimination in a Basic Law. Adjacent positions on the Nation-State Law are insufficient.

Ben Gvir and Otzma Yehudit consistently rule out any coalition partnership with Ra'am or an Arab party, without an exception for accepting the coalition guidelines.

No official source or parliamentary action was found that takes a position on raising taxes on high earners in order to expand social services.

Otzma Yehudit MK Almog Cohen explicitly sought to expand the number of food products subject to price controls. This is the precise position of a serving parliamentary-group member, not a full party platform.

Yitzhak Kreuzer explicitly opposed tariff removal that harms farmers and backed the fight against it; Kreuzer and Zvika Fogel were also among those demanding protection and assistance for farmers before tariff reductions. These are direct steps against giving tariff reductions priority, but without a platform or a decision by the full parliamentary group, confidence is medium.

Limor Son Har-Melech sponsored the bill, and all four Otzma Yehudit members who participated supported determining eligibility based only on the mother's employment.

Otzma Yehudit chair Itamar Ben Gvir voted to approve the exemption up to $130.

Itamar Ben Gvir welcomed the end of administrative detention against Jewish settlers and presented it as righting an injustice.

Otzma Yehudit advanced a more stringent version of the Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law and therefore opposes replacing the prohibition with individual assessment.

The bill to ban conversion therapy for minors was defeated in January 2026, but the report does not provide a complete roll call or a direct statement by Otzma Yehudit. Coalition membership and the absence of public opposition are insufficient to attribute a stance, so the previous coding is removed from the calculation.

Otzma Yehudit continues to promote expanded police powers and exceptional enforcement measures, including Zvika Fogel's current initiatives against criminal organizations. The official parliamentary actions reinforce its preference for security and emergency measures over the priority the thesis gives to civilian and local measures.

No Otzma Yehudit party source was found that takes a position on implementing a congestion charge in the Tel Aviv metropolitan area and earmarking its proceeds.