Yashar!

In July 2026, Eisenkot, as chair of Yashar!, pledged that a state commission of inquiry would be established and explicitly contrasted it with the political commission promoted by the government. This is a current, direct quotation from the party leader.

Yashar! commits to an independent judiciary and the rule of law, while Eisenkot also proposes judicial reform, strengthening the Knesset, and Basic Law: Legislation. The sources reviewed do not show whether this framework would expand, preserve, or curtail the scope of judicial review.

Yashar!'s current official ten-step plan includes limiting the prime minister's tenure to two terms.

Eisenkot opposed the 2026 budget's coalition funds in real time and demanded that they be redirected to the north, small businesses, reservists, and working parents. This is current support for reallocating the funds, but it does not specify a permanent legal rule for every coalition agreement.

The sources reviewed contained no quotation, platform provision, or parliamentary action that establishes whether the government may act contrary to the attorney general's opinion as long as a court has not invalidated the decision. General support for gatekeepers or an independent judiciary is insufficient to establish a position on this precise mechanism.

The plan Eisenkot presented in 2024 included a coalition of the United States, Israel, and Arab states, and transferring civilian responsibility to a local Palestinian body under regional and international oversight. It is an exact fit for the thesis, but it predates the establishment of Yashar! in its current form.

Eisenkot's plan called for Israeli freedom of security action and monitoring of the Gaza–Egypt border, alongside an alternative civilian administration. It fits the thesis well, but the plan was published before Yashar! was established.

In July 2026, Eisenkot said that it was not right to discuss final status or a Palestinian state at present. This opposes putting the issue on the agenda during this election, rather than ruling out every future agreement in principle.

Yashar!'s principles contain no commitment to applying sovereignty over Area C and no explicit opposition to that precise move. General security positions do not fill the gap.

Yashar!'s principles require equal service for women and men, and Eisenkot said in the past that professional suitability, not gender, should determine who fills a role. His direct statement is old.

Gadi Eisenkot was asked explicitly whether settlement should be restored in the Gaza Strip. He answered no and added that settlement should not be restored anywhere in the Strip.

A 2018 report was found according to which Eisenkot, as chief of staff, opposed the death penalty for terrorists, but no complete primary quotation or current Yashar! party position was found on the law enacted in 2026. Under the strict evidentiary threshold, the party is therefore left without a position on this thesis.

Yashar!'s plan establishes a shared, mandatory Israeli service—military or civilian—for every part of society.

Yashar!'s official service plan includes enforcement and individual sanctions against anyone who fails to report without an exemption, including yeshiva students.

The organizer of the 'Sagi Laws' package reported in July 2026 that Eisenkot had signed the package and agreed to include it in the governing principles of a government he would form. The package defines a full civil-union route, registration as married, all rights of marriage, and operation alongside the religious route. Confidence is medium because no signed Yashar! document was published for review and the attribution of his signature comes from the organizer's report.

Gadi Eisenkot opposed the law, while Matan Kahana announced that he would support it. Yashar!'s leadership therefore has a direct disagreement on this question.

Yashar!'s 2026 foundational plan proposes expanding local authorities' powers in matters of religion and state, including public transport on Shabbat. This is consistent with Eisenkot's earlier direct statement that each local authority should be allowed to operate public transport on Shabbat according to the character of its population. The fit with the wording is strong, but confidence remains medium because the current source is a report about the party document rather than an official party page.

Yashar!'s plan makes full funding conditional on compliance with the state curriculum and the core curriculum, and reduces funding for institutions that do not meet the condition.

Yashar!'s principles include civic equality, but no explicit commitment was found to enshrine the right to equality and the prohibition of discrimination in a Basic Law. A general value alone does not constitute support for this measure.

Eisenkot explicitly said that an Arab party that accepts the government's principles and agrees to service would be regarded as a partner.

Yashar!'s principles address growth, efficiency, and social justice, but do not establish a position on raising taxes on high earners to expand services.

Yashar! commits to addressing the cost of living, but does not specify whether the basket of foods under price controls should be expanded.

Yashar!'s plan combines diversified imports and competition with protection, direct support, and stronger domestic production. This is a balanced line that does not endorse tariff reductions even at the cost of harming farmers.

Yashar!'s economic plan gives priority in daycare subsidies and government benefits to reservists and working, productive families. In other words, it counts the work and service of the whole household, not only the mother's employment. The father's studies are not mentioned explicitly in the plan.

No Yashar! source was found that establishes a position on the $130 VAT-exemption threshold for personal imports.

Gadi Eisenkot explicitly opposed ending the orders and said that, in extreme cases, they are needed to prevent Jewish terrorism and preserve the ability of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to enforce security and public order.

No source in Yashar!'s principles or Eisenkot's statements was found that establishes whether the Citizenship Law's prohibition should be replaced with individualized security screening.

The same report attributes to Eisenkot a signature and commitment to the entire 'Sagi Laws' package. The package calls for a comprehensive statutory ban on conversion therapy, so it necessarily includes the narrower ban for minors. Confidence is medium for the same reason: indirect attribution.

Yashar!'s public-security plan combines a multi-year program for the police, enforcement bodies, and prosecution with prevention, employment, stronger local authorities, and partnership with Arab-society leadership. It does not rely primarily on the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet), which is exactly the direction proposed by the thesis.

No provision in Yashar!'s plans was found that establishes a position on the Tel Aviv metropolitan congestion charge and the allocation of its revenue.